3R Method - Reconstruction, Reconciliation, and Conflict Resolution
A response to the requirements of the possible world
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62155/eirene.v9i16.317Keywords:
reciprocal commitment, positive valuation, mutual care, human sensitivity, social cohesionAbstract
Mutual recognition and social justice for all are required as inherent elements in the goals of a culture of peace, positive peace, and non-violence. This research, resulting from a documentary review with a qualitative approach, aimed to analyze the contributions of the 3R method—Reconstruction, Reconciliation, and Resolution of conflicts—as components that, in addition to being implicitly considered part of a process associated with peaceful coexistence, are needed as a response to the requirements of the so-called "possible world." The results and discussion indicate that human coexistence in the future depends significantly on the eradication of intransigent, rigid, and opposing positions to sustainable understanding, which requires the construction of functional interpersonal relationships in which the common horizon is the intelligent and rational management of contradictions, the treatment of historical differences transmitted from generation to generation, and the suppression of fundamentalisms in favor of possibilities for understanding, in which the emphasis of humanity revolves around the willingness to be flexible in negotiating and building scenarios interwoven by common principles that, together with the availability for dialogue, give rise to empathetic treatment that serves as an attenuating factor for emerging multifactorial conflict. In conclusion, the possible world can only be built from the unification of synergistic efforts around a deep and empathetic understanding of the multiplicity of worldviews, pluralisms, and diverse positions, which must be addressed through the creation of bonds of respect, recognition, and trust that revitalize the social fabric.
Downloads
References
Aarón, A., Milicic, N., Sánchez, M y Subercaseaux, J. (2017). Construyendo juntos: claves para la convivencia escolar. Agencia de Calidad de la Educación.
Arango, V. (2007). Paz social y cultura de paz. Ediciones Panamá Viejo.
Barragán, F., Maćkowicz, J., Szarota, Z y Pérez, D. (2020). Educación para la paz, la equidad los valores. Ediciones Octaedro.
Battistessa, D. (2018). Johan Galtung y el método transcend: experiencias y prácticas de resolución de conflictos con métodos pacíficos en América Latina. Cuaderno Jurídico y Político, 4(2), 60-72. https://doi.org/10.5377/cuadernojurypol.v4i12.11120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5377/cuadernojurypol.v4i12.11120
Bobbio, N. (1986). El futuro de la democracia. Fondo de Cultura Económica. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.24484903e.1986.2.60044
Calderón, P. (2009). Teoría del conflicto de Johan Galtung. Revista Paz y Conflictos, 2 (2), 60-81. https://revistaseug.urg.es/index.php/revpaz/article/view/432/477
Camps, V. (2011). El gobierno de las emociones. Herder Editorial. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvt9k08t
Cely-Fuentes, D. (2021). Teoría de la resolución de conflictos de Johan Galtung para la implementación de la Cátedra de la Paz. Revista Tecnología-Educativa 2.0, 11 (2), 48-56. https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v11i2.252 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v11i2.251
Cortina, A. (2021). Ética cosmopolita. Una apuesta por la cordura en tiempos de pandemia. Paidós.
Diez, J. (2024). In Memoriam Johan Galtung (1930-2024). Revista Española de Ciencias Sociológicas, 187, 3-6. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.187.3-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.187.3-6
Fisas-Armengol, V. (1998). Cultura de paz y gestión de conflictos. Icaria.
Freire, P. (2006). Pedagogía de la tolerancia. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Galtung, J. (s/f). Violencia, conflictos y su impacto. Sobre los efectos invisibles e invisibles de la violencia. Disponible https://red.pucp.edu.pe/wp-content/uploads/biblioteca/081020.pdf
Galtung, J. (1984). ¡Hay alternativas! 4 caminos hacia la paz y la seguridad. Tecnos.
Galtung, J. (1998). Tras la violencia, 3R: reconstrucción, reconciliación, resolución. Afrontando los efectos visibles e invisibles de la guerra y la violencia. Red Gernika.
Galtung, J. (2003a) Paz por medios pacíficos. Paz y conflicto, desarrollo y civilización, Gernika Gogoratuz.
Galtung, J. (2003b), Violencia Cultural. Guernika-Lumo, Gernika Gogoratuz.
Galtung, J. (2003c) Trascender y transformar. Una introducción al trabajo de conflictos. Transcend – Quimera.
Galtung, J. (2009). Paz por medios pacíficos: paz y conflictos, desarrollo y civilización. Gernika Gogoratuz y Working Papers Munduam Paz y Desarrollo.
García, V. (2000). Johan Galtung. La transformación de los conflictos en medios pacíficos. Cuadernos de Estrategia, 111, 2009, 125-159 https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5995158
Jares, X., Ugarte, J., Mancisidor y Oianguren, M. (2006). El papel de la investigación para la paz ante la violencia en el País Vasco. Gernika Gogoratuz.
Morales, J. (2024a). Derechos humanos, cultura de paz y educación en ciudadanía global: triada de una política pública garante de la convivencia humana. Revista DYCS VICTORIA, 6(2), 38-52. https://doi.org/10.29059/rdycsv.v6i2.207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29059/rdycsv.v6i2.207
Morales, J. (2024b). Una política pública sobre cultura de paz, pluralismo y libertad positiva basada en Johan Galtung e Isaiah Berlin. Ius Comitiãlis, 7 (14), 158-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36677/ic.v7i14.24585
Nussbaum, M. (1999). Los límites del patriotismo. Paidós.
Oswald, Ú. (2003). Resolución pacífica de conflictos: un deporte poco popular. Workins Papers.
Sandoval, B. (2023). Teoría de la paz de Johan Galtung en la educación. Revista de Investigación y Praxis en Cs Sociales, 2 (3), 171-176. https://doi.org/10.24054/ripcs.v2i3.2392
Salinas, B. (2023). Educación para la paz desde Galtung. Análisis, 55 (102), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.15332/21459169.7634 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15332/21459169.7634
Savater, F. (2000). Ética y ciudadanía: tolerancia y solidaridad. Editorial Ariel.
Sen, A. (2021). Un hogar en el mundo. Taurus.
Ury, W. (1993) ¡Supere el no! Cómo negociar con personas que adoptan posiciones obstinadas. Editorial Norma.
Ury, W. (1999). Alcanzar la paz. Resolución de conflictos y mediación en la familia, el trabajo y el mundo. Paidós.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
ARK
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jesús Alfredo Morales Carrero
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notices Proposed by Creative Commons
1. Proposed Policy for Journals Offering Open Access
Those authors who have publications with this journal, accept the following terms:
a. Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Recognition License for which the user is free to: share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; and to remix, transform and build from the material. This under the following terms:
- Credit must be given appropriately (journal, author, url / doi).
- A link to the license is provided.
- It is indicated if the changes were made.
- They are not used for commercial purposes.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (eg: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
c. Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (eg: in institutional telematic files or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can lead to interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access).
.png)
.png)
.jpg){kind=logo}
