Legal-Ethical Reflections on Genetics, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of Human Rights

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62155/eirene.v7i12.246

Keywords:

genetic manipulation, transhumanism, artificial intelligence, materialism, Human Rights

Abstract

The right to equality becomes significant in the context of genetic manipulation, as the ability to design individuals with specific traits raises significant concerns. In particular, there is a risk of undermining genetic diversity and the fundamental principle of equality before the law. Furthermore, the gap that could emerge between those with the means to afford these genetic enhancements and those who cannot threatens to exacerbate economic disparities. One of the cornerstones of democratic societies, social mobility, is endangered by the insurmountable advantages that individuals born with advanced genetic modifications may enjoy, potentially leading to a consolidation of social classes and eroding the meritocracy that underpins many of our social structures. This study addresses the concern that these trends could lead to a divided society, where genetically enhanced elites perpetuate their status, and power structures take on a feudal character. Given this hypothetical risk, the imperative need for a robust legal framework is highlighted, one that not only protects human rights but also prevents the creation of insurmountable inequalities through genetic manipulation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Borja García Vázquez, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León

Investigador Nacional Nivel 1 (SNI-1). Doctor en Métodos Alternos de Solución de Conflictos por la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León (UANL). Profesor de Derecho Internacional Público en la UANL. Máster en Derecho de los negocios y litigación internacional por la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos. Abogado ejerciente colegiado en el Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Madrid. Mediador inscrito el Registro de Mediadores e Instituciones de Mediación del Ministerio de Justicia de España. Orcid.org/0000-0003-0055-6917.

References

Bauman, Z. (2020). La globalización. Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Cellan-Jones, R. (2 de december de 2014). Stephen Hawking warns artificial intelligence could end mankind. Obtenido de BBC News: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-30290540

Comisión Europea. (30 de octubre de 2023). Principios rectores internacionales del proceso de Hiroshima para un sistema avanzado de IA. Obtenido de Comisión Europea: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/es/library/hiroshima-process-international-guiding-principles-advanced-ai-system

Fischer, A. (8 de febrero de 2023). He Jiankui: el científico que creó bebés modificados genéticamente vuelve a la ciencia tras estar encarcelado. Obtenido de National Geographic: https://www.ngenespanol.com/ciencia/he-jiankui-como-crear-bebes-modificados-geneticamente/

Fukuyama, F. (2004). Transhumanism. Foreign Policy, 42-43.

Grupo de Expertos sobre Líbia. (2021). Letter dated 8 March 2021 from the Panel of Experts on Libya Established pursuant to Resolution 1973 (2011) addressed to the President of the Security Council. Obtenido de Naciones Unidas - Biblioteca Digital: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3905159?ln=es

Gutmann, R. (2012). El comunismo en la India y el reto político de las castas. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales.

HM Government. (25 de october de 2023). Safety and Security Risks of Generative Artificial Intelligence to 2025. Obtenido de Gov.uk: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/653932db80884d0013f71b15/generative-ai-safety-security-risks-2025-annex-b.pdf

Huxley, J. (1957). Transhumanism. En J. Huxley, New bottle for new wine (págs. 13-17). London: Chatto & Windus.

Manning, C. (september de 2020). Artificial Intelligence Definitions. Obtenido de Stanford University: https://hai.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/2020-09/AI-Definitions-HAI.pdf

National Human Genome Research Institute. (2023). Talking Glossary of Genomic and Genetic Terms. Obtenido de National Human Genome Research Institute: https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary

Navas Navarro, S. (2017). Derecho e inteligencia artificial desde el diseño. Aproximaciones. En S. Navas Navarro, C. Górriz López, S. Camacho Clavijo, S. Robert Guillén, M. Castells i Marqués, & I. Matero Borge, Inteligencia artificial (págs. 23-72). Valencia: Tirant Lo Blanch.

Ng, A. (2022). Lecture 9. Obtenido de Stanford University: https://cs230.stanford.edu/lecture/9/

Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Penguin Books Limited.

Stanford University. (2013). Deep Blue. Obtenido de Artificial Intelligence: Principles and Techniques: https://stanford.edu/~cpiech/cs221/apps/deepBlue.html

Stanford University. (2016). Game-playing: DeepBlue and AlphaGo. Obtenido de https://web.stanford.edu/class/archive/cs/cs221/cs221.1186/sections/section5.pdf

Stanford University. (2023). Background. Obtenido de Stanford University: https://aire.stanford.edu/background

UNESCO. (1969). Cuatro declaraciones sobre la cuestión racial. Obtenido de UNESDOC - Biblioteca Digital: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000128133

Vincent, J. (27 de noviembre de 2019). Former Go champion beaten by DeepMind retires after declaring AI invincible. Obtenido de The Verge: https://www.theverge.com/2019/11/27/20985260/ai-go-alphago-lee-se-dol-retired-deepmind-defeat

Yang, Z. (1 de november de 2023). China wants to win the gene therapy race—and it’ll spend millions. Obtenido de MIT Technology Review: https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/11/01/1082740/china-gene-therapty-deafness-hearing/

Published

2024-01-14

How to Cite

García Vázquez, B. (2024). Legal-Ethical Reflections on Genetics, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of Human Rights: . Eirene Studies of Peace and Conflicts, 7(12), 111–138. https://doi.org/10.62155/eirene.v7i12.246

ARK