The Conciliation in divorce proceedings
a mechanism for peace
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62155/eirene.v7i12.237Keywords:
Conciliation, divorce, Peace, benefitAbstract
Conciliation is a method of peaceful conflict resolution, which has been introduced as a human right since 2008 in Mexico with the reform of Article 17 of the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States, allowing family conciliation in divorce proceedings to be a more beneficial way in terms of emotional, economic and time than judicial proceedings, achieving an atmosphere of peace between spouses and their children. The objective of this research is focused on knowing the scope of conciliation in divorce proceedings favoring its benefits, from a national and international perspective. A deductive-inductive method was used with empirical approach techniques with legal and documentary analysis. It is concluded that there is an incorrect diffusion of conciliation both in the Judicial Power and in the postulant lawyers and that it can be applied to benefit the population through the satisfaction of needs to achieve peace.
Downloads
References
Bustamante, M. (2016). Rumbo al centenario de la Constitución. Secretaría de cultura. http://constitucion1917.gob.mx/es/Constitucion1917/22_julio_CH
Código Civil Federal. (2021).
Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. (2023). Diario Oficial de la Federación.
Cornelio Landero, E. (2014). Los mecanismos alternativos de solución de controversias como derecho humano. Barataria, Revisa Castellano Manchega de Ciencias Sociales, (17).
Cornelio Landero, E. (2022). Marco normativo de la paz en la educación en México. En G.G. Francisco (coord.), La paz a través de la educación (37-46). ANUIES.
Cox, S. (2001). Métodos alternativos de resolución de conflictos en los sistemas de justicia de los países americanos. Consejo permanente de la Organización de los Estados Americanos (OEA). https://camejal.jalisco.gob.mx/sites/camejal.jalisco.gob.mx/files/metodosalternativos.pdf
Escalante Barboza, K. y Brenes Villalobos, M. E. (2004). Nueva visión de la conciliación en materia de familia y su relación con el interés superior del niño(a). Medicina Legal de Costa Rica, 21(2), 85-100.
Etimologías. (2023). Divorcio. Etimología de divorcio. http://etimologias.dechile.net/?divorcio#:~:text=La%20palabra%20divorcio%20viene%20del,%2C%20girar%20o%20hacer%20girar).&text=En%20estas%20se%20pod%C3%ADa%20solicitar,marido%20como%20de%20la%20mujer.
Ferrajoli, L. et al. (2013). La teoría del derecho en el paradigma constitucional. Fontamara
Flores Serrano, J. J. (2017). Antecedentes de los medios alternativos de solución de controversias [Diapositivas en Prezi]. Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla. https://prezi.com/qmgfcojzom78/linea-de-tiempo-masc/
Gorjón Gómez, F. J. y Sánchez García, A. (2015). Las 101 preguntas de la mediación. Guía práctica para el abogado. Tirant Lo Blanch.
Islas, A., Vera-Hernández, D. y Miranda-Medina, C. (2018). La cultura de paz en las políticas de Educación Superior de México, Colombia y El Salvador. Revista Educación y Humanismo, 20(34), 312-325.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17081/eduhum.20.34.2875
Ormachea Choque, I. (1999). Manual de conciliación. Instituto Peruano de Resolución de Conflictos, Negociación y Mediación.
Peña Gonzáles, O. (2014). Mediación y conciliación extrajudicial. Flores.
Pérez Valdéz, M. C. (2006). Matrimonio, divorcio y medios alternativos de solución de conflictos en Panorama internacional de derecho de familia, culturas y sistemas jurídicos comparados. En R. M. Álvarez de Lara (coord.). Panorama internacional de derecho de familia. Culturas y sistemas jurídicos comparados. UNAM.
SCJN. (2011). Divorcio Incausado. IIJ-UNAM, SCJN.
SCJN. (2015). Tesis: 1a./J. 28/2015 (10a.). Gaceta del Semanario Judicial de la Federación.
Libro 20, Julio de 2015, Tomo I, página 570.
Victoria Parra, C. L. (2011). Análisis del divorcio necesario por causas objetivas. [Tesis de Licenciatura en Derecho, Universidad de Sonora]. Biblioteca digital UNISON.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
ARK
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Karla Alejandra Cordero Gallegos, Erick Cornelio Patricio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notices Proposed by Creative Commons
1. Proposed Policy for Journals Offering Open Access
Those authors who have publications with this journal, accept the following terms:
a. Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Recognition License for which the user is free to: share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; and to remix, transform and build from the material. This under the following terms:
- Credit must be given appropriately (journal, author, url / doi).
- A link to the license is provided.
- It is indicated if the changes were made.
- They are not used for commercial purposes.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (eg: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
c. Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (eg: in institutional telematic files or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can lead to interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access).
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg){kind=logo}
