Grand mediation as a preservation system for social stability
Keywords:
Mediation, Mediation in China, Grand Mediation, Citizenship of Justice, Social Harmony, Social Protests, Alternative Dispute Resolution MethodsAbstract
This paper analyzes the social stability and justice in Latin America, exposing the reception in their
countries of normative regulation of mediation procedures; a system used in the People’s Republic
of China as a guarantor of social stability, based on a genuine institution of this Asian country, the
Great Mediation, whose study can serve as a model for the creation of citizen justice policies in Latin
America.
Downloads
References
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2018). Por qué fracasan los países . Ciudad de México: Crítica.
Ali, S. (2016). Mass-Claims Mediation in China. The Journal of Comparative Law, 10(2), 142-157.
Central Intelligence Agency. (2020). The World Factbook. Obtenido de Central Intelligence Agency: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2172rank.html
Chan, P. (2016). The position of mediation in contemporary Chinese civil justice: a proceduralist perspective. Maastricht: Maastricht University.
Chan, P. (2017). Mediation in Contemporary Chinese Civil Justice. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill.
Corporación Latinobarómetro. (2018). Informe 2018. Santiago de Chile: Corporación Latinobarómetro.
Estlund, C. (2017). A New Deal for China´s Workers? London: Harvard University Press.
Estlund, C., & Halegua, A. (2018). What is socialist about labour law in China? En F. Hualing, J. Gillespie, P. Nicholson, & W. Partlett, Socialist law in socialist east asia (págs. 257-287). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fang, H. (2016). The Chinese Health Care System. Obtenido de The Commonwealth Fund: https://international.commonwealthfund.org/countries/china/
Feng, C. (2013). The Dilemma of Stability Preservation in China. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 42(2), 3-19.
Feng, C. (2014). The quest for constitutional democracy in contemporary China. En E. Fung, & S. Drakeley, Democracy in Eastern Asia (págs. 246-265). Oxon: Routledge.
Fukuyama, F. (2019). ¿El fin de la Historia? y otros ensayos. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Ghersi, C. (2018). Los costos, costes y costas en la resolución de conflictos. Ciudad de México: Tirant lo Blanch.
Gorjón Gómez, F. (2015). Teoría de la impetración de la justicia. Por la necesaria ciudadanización de la justicia y la paz. Comunitania, 113-131.
Gorjón Gómez, F., & Adame, M. (2016). Clausulas med/arb sistema de aseguramiento de la ciudadanización de la justicia. Letras jurídicas: revista electrónica de derecho(21).
Gorjón Gómez, F., & Sánchez García, A. (2016). Vademécum de mediación y arbitraje. Ciudad de México: Tirant Lo Blanch.
Hand, K. (2011). Resolving Constitutional Disputes in Contemporary China. University of Pennsylvania East Asia Law Review, 7, 51-159.
Helgy Analytics. (2019). Rice consumption Per Capita in China. Obtenido de Helgy Analytics: https://www.helgilibrary.com/indicators/rice-consumption-per-capita/china/
Higueras y Rumbao, G. (2019). China «todo bajo el cielo». Cuadernos de estrategia(200), 87-112.
Huntington, S. (2019). El choque de civilizaciones y la reconfiguración del orden mundial. Ciudad de México: Paidós.
Institute for Economics & Peace. (2020). Global Peace Index. Obtenido de Vision of humanity: http://visionofhumanity.org/indexes/global-peace-index/
Jiang, J. (2016). Criminal Reconciliation in Contemporary China. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Jieren, H. (2011). Grand Mediation in China. Asian Survey, 51(6), 1065-1089.
Jieren, H., & Ligjian, Z. (2015). Grand Mediation and legitimacy enhancement in contemporary China - the Guang´an model. Journal of Contemporary China, 24(91), 43-63.
Kissinger, H. (2016). Orden mundial. Barcelona: Penguin Radonm House.
Lansdowne, H., & Wu , G. (2009). Introduction. En H. Lansdowne, & G. Wu, Socialist China, Capitalist China (págs. 1-9). Oxon: Routledge.
LAPOP. (2019). El pulso de la democracia. Nashville: Vanderbilt University. Obtenido de https://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/ab2018/2018-19_AmericasBarometer_Regional_Report_Spanish_W_03.27.20.pdf
Leong, M. (2016). The Development of Grand Mediation and its implications for China´s Regime Resilience: the Li Qin Mediation Office. China Review, 16(1), 95-119.
Li, L., Chen, Q., & Powers, D. (2012). Chinese Healthcare Reform: A Shift toward Social Development. Modern China, 38(6), 630-645.
Li, X., Jiao, W., Xiao, R., Chen, W., & Chang, A. (2015). Soil pollution and site remediation policies in China: a review. Environmental Review. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2014-0073
Liebman, B. (2014). China´s Law Stability Paradox. Daedalus Spring, 143(2), 96-109.
Liebman, B. (2015). China´s Law and Stability Paradox. En J. deLisle, & A. Goldstein, China´s Callenges (págs. 157-177). Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Lubman, S. (2014). China: The Quest for Procedural Justice. En B. Sabahi, N. Birch, I. Laird, & J. Rivas, A revolution in the international rule of law: essays in honor of Don Wallace, Jr. (págs. 85-98). New York: Juris Publishing.
Mahr, K. (23 de febrero de 2011). Heavy metal: 12 million tons of chinese rice contaminated. Obtenido de Time: https://science.time.com/2011/02/23/heavy-metal-millions-of-tons-of-chinese-rice-contaminated/
Meng, X. (2014). China´s Labour Market Tensions and Future Urbanisation Challenges. En L. Song, R. Garnaut, & C. Fang, Deeoubg reform for China´s long-term growth and development (págs. 379-405). Canberra: ANU Press.
Milcent, C. (2010). Healthcare for migrants in urban China: a new frontier. China perspectives(4), 33-46.
Navas Paús, E., & Gonzalo Quiroga, M. (2015). ADR y violencia. Revista de mediación, 61-71.
Ngok, K., & Xie, B. (2016). Labour policy. En K. Ngok, & C. Kwan Chan, China´s Social Policy (págs. 66-83). New York: Routledge.
O´Brien, K., & Deng, Y. (2017). Preventing Protest One Person at a Time: Psychological Coercion and Relational Repression in China. China Review, 17(2), 179-201.
Sánchez García, A. (2015). Mediación y arbitraje. México D.F.: Tirant lo Blanch.
Steinhardt, H., & Litao, Z. (2015). From "stability overrides everything" to "social governance": the evolving approach to social order in China. En Z. Yongnian, & L. Gore, China entering the Xi Jinping Era (págs. 193-215). Oxon: Routledge.
Tamames, R., & Debasa, F. (2013). China tercer milenio. Barcelona: Planeta.
Tapia, M., Elfström, M., & Roca-Servat, D. (2018). Bridging social movement and industrial relations theory: an analysis of worker organizing campaigns in the United States and China. En F. Briscoe, B. King, & J. Leitzinger, Social movements, stakeholders and non-market strategy (págs. 173-206). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
The Economist. (2019). Democracy Index 2019. Obtenido de The Economist Intelligence Unit: https://www.eiu.com/topic/democracy-index
The Fund for Peace. (2020). Fragility in the World. Obtenido de Fragile States Index: https://fragilestatesindex.org/
The Supreme People´s Court of the People´s Republic of China. (october de 2011). The Socialist System of Laws with Chinese Characteristics. Obtenido de The Supreme People´s Court of the People´s Republic of China: http://english.court.gov.cn/2015-07/17/content_21312781_7.htm
The Supreme People´s Court of the People´s Republic of China. (october de 2012). Judicial Reform in China. Obtenido de The Supreme People´s Court of the People´s Republic of China: http://english.court.gov.cn/2015-07/17/content_21312834_9.htm
The World Bank. (2020). GDP per capita (current US$). Obtenido de The World Bank: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.ADJ.NNTY.PC.CD
Tong, X., & Zhang, H. (2020). China´s Emergency Management. Singapore: Social Science Academic Press.
Weidong, J. (2013). The Judicial Reform in China: The Status Quo and Future Directions. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies(185), 185-220.
World Justice Project. (2019). WJP Rule of Law Index. Obtenido de World Justice Project: https://worldjusticeproject.org/rule-of-law-index/global
Xinwei, L. (2017). La mediación en China: aportaciones de occidente. Madrid: Dykinson.
Yaqing, Q. (2012). Cultura y pensamiento global: una teoría china de las relaciones internacionales. Revista CIDOB d'afers internacionals(100), 67-90.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
ARK
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Eirene Estudios de Paz y Conflictos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notices Proposed by Creative Commons
1. Proposed Policy for Journals Offering Open Access
Those authors who have publications with this journal, accept the following terms:
a. Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Recognition License for which the user is free to: share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; and to remix, transform and build from the material. This under the following terms:
- Credit must be given appropriately (journal, author, url / doi).
- A link to the license is provided.
- It is indicated if the changes were made.
- They are not used for commercial purposes.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (eg: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
c. Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (eg: in institutional telematic files or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can lead to interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access).
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg){kind=logo}
